Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Decontamination of Dental Implants Using Two Different Solutions and Different Contact Times:
المؤلف
Abdel mooty,Adeeb Ali Mohamed.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / على محمد عبد المعطى
مشرف / تامر عبد البارى حامد
مشرف / ابراهيم حسين احمد
مناقش / وليد عبد الله
مناقش / محمد احمد الشلقامى
الموضوع
Dentistry.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
93 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
- جراحه الفم والوجه والفكين
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 97

from 97

Abstract

Twenty eight male New Zealand rabbits aged 8- 10 weeks and weighting
2.5–3.0 kg in animal house of faculty of veterinary medicine of Suez
Canal University has been used, ketamine and xylotazine HCL used
intramuscularly for anesthesia of the animals( ketamine 35 mg/kg ,
xylotazine Hcl 5mg/kg IM)( Tranquilli et al (eds.) 2007). Sites for
implants was at the tibial bone. Animals were divided into two groups
each fourteen animals. One has been used for the dental implants
decontaminated by chlorhexidine 2% and the other group used for the
dental implants decontaminated by ozonated water. Each group subdivided
into two subgroups each of seven. One of them used for the contact time
of one minute and the other one has been used for the three minutes
contact. All animals have been sacrificed 8 weeks post implantation. The
operated tibia have been harvested and preserved in formalin 10%.
New bone and the osteoid matrix content around the dental implants has
been evaluated histologically to find out the following.
Decontamination of already contaminated dental implant with human
saliva prior to implantation using chlorohxidine 2% for three minutes give
decent and proper result on the surrounding bony tissues than using
ozonated water from ozone generator device (output400 mg/hour ) when
used for the same exact time in addition to chlorohexidine having
advantages of being:-
1- less expensive
2- availability
3- validity period
4- decent shelf life
5- more easy to handle and use.
6- No need for special devices or electricity
Summary and Conclusion
83
Difficulty in handling the instrument in ozonated water for such purpose
as it has all of the following disadvantages
1-so stormy and filled with bubbles
2-ozonated water has high dissolving power for rubber latex of the
operator’s gloves
3- complicated in use
4- the sharp smell of the ozone gas irritate the operator
5- short shelf life
6- need special equipment
7-Electricity dependent