الفهرس 
الاباحة فى جرائم الرأى و التعبير : دراسة مقارنة
قائمة المختصراتيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 410 |  |  |
| | | from | 410 | | |
المستخلص
This study is entitled ”the permissibility of crimes of opinion and expression” ”a comparative study”, where the detailed treatment of the aspects of this subject on the contexts of Egyptian and French law, with comparison with the provisions of Islamic Sharia, and Anglo-American law whenever necessary, and then followed the methodology of analytical and original research Comparative.
This study dealt consists of preliminary study, and two chapters. In the preliminary study, it reviewed the nature of opinion crimes so that it could serve as the general rule from which to research the causes of permissibility in crimes of opinion and expression, then moved to explain the reasons for permissibility that do not require a specific character, which is the right to publish the news, the right to criticism, and the right to address the authorities, in the first chapter of this study, then the study dealt with in the second chapter of this study the reasons for permissibility that require a certain qualification, which is the right to challenge the actions of the public servant or those in his wisdom, and the right to express in Parliament, and the right to defend before the courts.
Finally, this study ended by a conclusion that includes the suggestions and recommendations that we have concluded on the subject of the study.