الفهرس Only 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 100 |  |  |
| | | from | 100 | | |
Abstract
Twenty controlled trials(RCTs) 3286 tow total published randomized involving a of patients suitable present were the meta-analysis. meta-analysis for in inclusion This carried compare results out the invasive that to of minimally with discectomy(MlD) of standard regarding open treatment lumber prolapsed dicectomy(OD) disc in of (LDP) perioperative dural complications(blood root wound infection and loss, tear, nerye injury, recurrent and postoperative disc herniation),operative duration, hospital stay pain(VAS score and for leg pain). back At the first we discussed following: Review literature relevant anatomy biomechanics the lumbar of and including of the spine the pathogenesis and management disc prolapse. followed by lumber of Evidence the spine importance, based medicine(EBM) including definition, in surgery its steps . and level evidence of Systematic review including their definitions and Meta-analysis methodology behind ,the systematic do meta-analysis research . forest review to Also, and how description of plot in and value.where can meta-analysis systematic definition relativerisk find of we ieview data discussed to we that collect for Then the meta-analysis meta-analysis. comparing invasive discectomy in the results open versus of of minimally treatment LDp as the following: ! literature according to the search and publication inclusion selection criteria. I for validity , relevance and results of surgical interventions appraisal studies of the (OD and MID) n studies; number of patients, age of patients, follow up time, Data extraction from complications . and leg back VAS for and score pain f (comprehensive meta-analysis version3.0) with analysis datawas statistical to done