الفهرس | يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام |
المستخلص The research dealt with the evaluation of the discrepancies between the obstacles to integration in the localization of industry in the developed industrial complexes, as it is part of the state’s efforts after 2015 until 2030 according to the Egyptian strategic plan “Egypt Vision 2030”. contrary to the purpose for which it was established. The research highlighted the United Nations declaration of ”sustainable development”, highlighting the efforts of the countries of the world to reach this declaration, which aims to improve human conditions. The Egyptian strategic plan ”Egypt Vision 2030” was dealt with with an explanation of the objectives and dimensions in order to be able to address how it was planned to establish these developed industrial complexes, and explain that these industrial complexes are part of the state’s support for small and medium industrial projects, while addressing the legal definition of the Central Bank of Egypt for this type For projects, with an explanation of the state’s efforts to support these complexes within a comprehensive plan to support that level of projects, and an explanation of the state’s initiative “Your Factory is Ready with a License”. The research singled out the obstacles facing this national project for the development of small and medium industrial projects within the Egyptian strategic plan ”Egypt Vision 2030”, and the extent to which these obstacles vary in terms of economic, technological, and social obstacles. And to achieve this, the process of evaluation and comparison (benchmarking) was conducted at the level of the field study of a sample of the developed industrial complexes. The evaluation and comparison were done by building a questionnaire and measuring its validity and distribution by conducting a field study and evaluating the study variables and testing the main and subsidiary hypotheses of the study, and drawing the following results: 1- The results of evaluating workers in the developed industrial complexes for the two variables of the study proved the following: • The workers’ awareness of each of the independent variables (industrial integration) and its three dimensions (productive integration, technical integration, and marketing integration) are high values in society and are greater than the value expected from the researcher and estimated at (4). • The awareness of the workers of the dependent variable (localization of the developed industrial complexes) are high values in society and are greater than the expected value from the researcher and estimated at value (4). 2- The results of testing the first main hypothesis and its three sub-hypotheses proved the following: The validity of the first main hypothesis, as it was proven that there is a significant relationship between the application of industrial integration and the localization of the developed industrial complexes, and that the value of (89%) of the changes in their localization resulted from changes in (industrial integration) in these complexes. • The validity of the three sub-hypotheses emanating from the first main hypothesis, where it was proven that there are significant relationships between the three dimensions (productive integration, technical integration, marketing integration) of the independent variable (industrial integration) as independent variables and the dependent variable (localization of the developed industrial complexes) and that the level of influence of those The three dimensions of the independent variable on the dependent variable through the coefficient of determination ( ) amounted to (92.2%, 91.5%, 44.8), respectively. 3- The results of the tests for the second main hypothesis proved its validity through the following: • There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration) according to gender.” This means the validity of the second main hypothesis according to the demographic factor (gender). • There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration) according to age, and that workers with age (50 years and over) are the most aware of it, while workers with age (less than 35 years) are the least aware of it.” The validity of the second main hypothesis according to the demographic factor (age). • There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial complexes in their awareness of the independent variable (industrial integration) according to the scientific qualification, and that workers with scientific qualifications (postgraduate studies) are the most aware of the independent variable, while workers with educational qualifications (intermediate education) are the least aware of this. This means that the second main hypothesis is correct according to the demographic factor (the educational qualification). • There are fundamental differences between workers in the developed industrial complexes in their perception of the independent variable (industrial integration) according to years of experience, and that workers with years of experience (15 years or more) are the most aware of the independent variable (industrial integration), while workers with years of experience (less than 5 years) They are the least aware of this variable.” This means that the second main hypothesis is correct according to the demographic factor (years of experience). In light of the findings of the study, the researcher recommends that the following statements in each of the three dimensions (productive integration, technical integration, marketing integration) for the independent variable (industrial integration) and the dependent variable (localization of the developed industrial complexes) have obtained the lowest value and then the Management in the developed industrial complexes is necessary to take into account and implement the following: 1. In Dimension (Productive Integration): • The necessity for the Industrial Development Authority to increase interest in raising the efficiency of implementing environmental requirements within the industrial complex. 2. In Dimension (Technical Integration) • The necessity for the Industrial Modernization Center to follow up on the availability of specialized data necessary to keep pace with the (domestic - foreign) markets easily for the development of the industry. 3. In Dimension (Marketing Integration): • This dimension should be taken care of, as it has obtained the lowest value ( ) which is equal to its value (44.8%) of the changes in its settlement of the developed industrial complexes resulting from changes in the dimension (marketing integration). 4. In the dependent variable (localization of the developed industrial complexes):- • The Industrial Development Authority must ensure that industrial security standards are applied within the developed industrial complex |