الفهرس 
التعريف بكتاب الـجُمليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 551 |  |  |
| | | from | 551 | | |
المستخلص
This research attempted to study grammatical terms as a linguistic study in the light of the data of modern terminology, so he analyzed the terms in their formal or structural sides, and in their semantic side, guided by what was framed by the scholars of Arabic terminology and the modern scholars in the theory of that. Science agrees in many of its features with what modern science has reached.
And he found that the owner of the book ”aljumal” formed his terms within the framework of derivation and composition, and did not resort to sculpture in building his idiomatic dictionary, and the owner of the book ”aljumal” was not a novelty in that, rather the derivation was the refuge of the scholars of Islamic civilization in developing their terminology.
Looking at the morphological forms from which the grammatical term was formed in the Book of ”aljumal”, the researcher found that the idiomatic verb was strongly present next to the idiomatic noun, and that most of the roots that formed the terms of the book of ”aljumal” were triple roots, and the grammatical roots are, as he said, the triple grammatical roots. The most widely spread roots, in the structure of the general Arabic lexicon, and it is the main component in the structure of the terminology book of ”aljumal”.
It also became clear to the researcher that the synonym and the verbal common are two phenomena that exist in the reality of the scientific terminology, and they cause confusion, and make the meanings loose, and scientific languages need precision and accuracy, and the synonym and the conjunction negate that, and one of the most important features that must be available in the term, the term Every scientific concept has one term.
The researcher also stood on the uniqueness of the owner of the book”aljumal” in the use of some terms, including: the term (structure), the owner of the book”aljumal” used it to denote what is built, and it is not from the visual terms or the kufic ratio, and not what Al-khalil Ebn Ahmed used, and so on. It can be said that the terms used by the author of the sentence (al-khalaf –AL Beniah-distinction-interpretation...) may be specific, and combine with other evidence in documenting the attribution of the book to one of those to whom it is attributed, as evidenced by Al-Khalil’s evidence that Bin Ahmed, one of those to whom the book was attributed, and therefore it is a presumption in the way of denying the attribution of the book from Al-Khalil.