Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Impact of soft tissue manipulation versus traditional physiotherapy program on diaphragmatic excursion in asthmatic patients /
الناشر
Mostafa Mohamed Saad Shams Eldeen ,
المؤلف
Mostafa Mohamed Saad Shams Eldeen
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Mostafa Mohamed Saad Shams Eldeen
مشرف / Hala Mohamed Ezz Eldeen
مشرف / Mariam Elsayed Mohamed
مشرف / Khaled Mahmoud Kamel
تاريخ النشر
2021
عدد الصفحات
100 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
11/9/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 144

from 144

Abstract

Background and purpose: Asthma is an important worldwide health problem. Asthma carries major health risks with the most cause-specific mortalities being those of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases .Asthma may affect the respiratory function of children and adults.The aim of this study was to compare of soft tissue manipulation versus traditional physiotherapy program on diaphragmatic excursion in asthmatic patients. Subjects and methods: {u200E}Forty men and women participated in this study. Their age ranged from 20to 40 years old, suffered from mild asthma (FEV1 {u2265} 80 %). They were assigned into two equal groups:group (A) consisted of 20 participants received soft tissue manipulation of upper cervical region (C0-1), upper dorsal region (T3-4) and thoracolumbar junction followed by muscle energy technique once weekly for three weeks .group (B) consisted of 20 participants received traditional physiotherapy program (pursed lip breathing exercise, diaphragmatic breathing exercise) ten repetitions each exercise per session, three times a week for three weeks respectively . Results: There was significant improvement for group (A) and group (B) in FEV1 (4.10%{u2191}, 3.27 %{u2191}), PEF (22.85%{u2191}, 3.2 %{u2191}), diaphragmatic excursion (19.6%{u2191}, 4.5 %{u2191}) and maximum inspiratory pressure (14.58%{u2191}, 6.11 %{u2191}) for all participant in group A and B respectively, but there was statistical significance in favor of group A