Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Combined Posterior and Anterior Ring Fixation versus Posterior Ring Fixation Alone in Management of Unstable Tile B and C Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Randomized Controlled Trial/
الناشر
Ain Shams University.
المؤلف
Moussa,Islam Elsayed Mohammed .
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / اسلام السيد محمد موسى
مشرف / عمرو خيرى محمود
مشرف / الظاهر حسن الظاهر
مشرف / أحمد سالم عيد
مشرف / أحمد محمد سلام
تاريخ النشر
2021
عدد الصفحات
128.p;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
1/10/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Orthopaedic Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 130

from 130

Abstract

Background: Combined posterior & anterior ring fixation is classically performed in Tile B2 & C1 injuries to achieve superior biomechanical stability. However, it is unclear whether isolated posterior ring fixation can achieve comparable radiological and clinical outcomes or not. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the two fixation principles in managing Tile B2 and C1 injuries.
Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial between February 2017 and January 2019; 40 patients with Tile B2 & C1 injuries underwent intervention at a level one trauma center (mean age:30). Random allocation into two groups by block randomization; 20 cases via combined posterior & anterior ring fixation (group A), while the other 20 via isolated posterior ring fixation (group B). We compared the outcomes between the two groups primarily in terms: radiological & clinical outcomes and postoperative complications.
Results: Our study included 20 patients with Tile B2 & 20 patients with Tile C1 injuries; the mean follow-up duration was 2 years. Operative time (mean difference 0.575 hours) and blood loss (mean difference 97.5 ml) were lower in group B. Also, despite the higher frequency of rami displacement before union in the same group, there were no significant differences in terms of radiological outcome (excellent outcome with odds ratio 2.3), clinical outcome (excellent outcome with OR 2.852) & postoperative complications’ assessment (OR 1.556) at last follow-up.
Conclusion: Isolated posterior ring fixation is possible in managing Tile B2 & C1 injuries with comparable final radiological and clinical outcomes and similar postoperative complications rate to combined posterior & anterior ring fixation but with less morbidity (shorter operation time and lower amount of blood loss).
Level of Evidence: This is considered a level II evidence study (RCT).