الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Most ophthalmologists will encounter optic neuritis in the course of their practice. The disease behaves very differently in children versus adults. The ONTT and CHAMPS trials have given us important data regarding prognosis and management in adults, including probability of developing MS. Optic neuritis in children, while less common, must be considered in the differential diagnosis of subacute visual loss, especially children with bilateral impairment. Secondary causes of optic neuritis are more common in children and an investigation should be performed to assess for associated disease states. In both populations, the ophthalmologist will play a central role in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of these patients, whether it is an isolated case of optic neuritis or the initial presentation of a long-term struggle with MS. With the advent of immunomodulating therapy to minimize both the subsequent incidence and severity of MS, early diagnosis and appropriate management by the ophthalmologist has become even more critical. It is widely accepted that in children, attacks of optic neuritis usually occur following a febrile illness, tend to affect both eyes, are frequently associated with swollen discs, improve rapidly, and have a low conversion rate to multiple sclerosis (MS)[ 6,24,37,25,26, 36,65]. On the other hand, optic neuritis in adults is usually unilateral, predominantly affects the retrobulbar portion of the optic nerve, and presents a high conversion rate to MS [95, 96]. The largest reported series of cases of pediatric optic neuritis are summarized in Table 11 [3- 6, 21, 22, 24- 26, 28-30, 38, 65]. This table includes the presumably idiopathic cases and excludes those reportedly due to infection, neoplastic disease, and vasculitis. It also combines cases that are reported in more than one series [24, 26, 38]. A total of 346 cases are reported in these series with a mean age of 9.8 years (range: 1-17 years). 61% of the reported cases were female, but female prevalence varied from 41% to 81% in these series. In the present series 65% were female. |